David Reichart

Conservative Novelist and Independent Publisher

IndiePub: What’s not to love?

Written By: Dave - Apr• 28•12

The Independent Publishing Revolution is a good thing for writers like me, but it’s even better for people who love to read. The number of books in print today (printed with ink or pixels) is astounding. If you have a digital reader you can load it up with novels priced as low as 99 cents, some written by authors you’ve actually heard of. You can even find plenty of free novels that authors are making available for short-term promotions.  With increased opportunity, though, comes fierce rivalry. Even best-selling authors are getting a lot of competition, mostly based on price, from both e-books and print-on-demand paperbacks where shelf space in stores is not an issue.

A guy named John Locke began publishing electronic novels in the fall of 2010 and sold a million in the first five months. He had never written a book before but saw potential in the new publishing technology. His theory was that since famous authors were selling their e-books at 10 times the price of a John Locke novel, now they would have to prove that it was 10 times as good. It irritated him that critics called self-published novels “vanity” books. He pointed out that when he started his insurance company nobody called it a vanity business. To him, novel writing is a business.

Most of us hope we can someday truly consider ourselves “in business.” Right now I suspect many IndiePub authors are in it for the same reason I am, simply because the opportunity is finally there. Don’t let anyone tell you that writing novels is fun. Have you heard this: “Writers hate writing but love having written.” That is the pure and simple truth.

Here’s another bold and basic trueism: There is a lot of good fiction out there today that never would have been published without the IndiePub Revolution. Readers have much greater choices and have access to authors not vetted or edited (and sometimes tamed) by the New York publishing houses. People who love to read novels are finding that discovering new talent is fun and inexpensive. Authors certainly get a thrill out of finding readers, too.

 

Let ‘em do their job

Written By: Dave - Apr• 07•12

That truck driver cell phone law still sticks in my craw. It’s another regulation in an occupation drowning in regulations. It’s another attempt to collect revenue from people who are being targeted so often and by so many that they approach every day as though preparing  to run a gauntlet.  What really gets me is that this is another case of the Washington elite treating the rest of us like children. Again trucks are the target. And now there’s new technology to help Big Brother get you.

 Traffic fatalities are down 24% from 2005, but what’s also down? Revenues. This is another revenue grab. The law is full of verbiage about drivers taking their eyes off the road, as though doing so, if only briefly, will almost surely cause a crash. This concept relies on two of Washington’s favorite control mechanisms—demagoguery and political correctness. Texting while driving has become a big issue with emotional strings for the demagogues to play and right-thinking matters for the politically correct marionettes. Texting is dangerous. That’s why I don’t do it. But, see, this is how the enemies of liberty work: Most people agree texting is dangerous, the topic gets a lot of media exposure, and now, hell, let’s outlaw all communications equipment  that a driver would have to pick up and hold in his hand—because that would be distracted driving. And we are on the topic of distracted driving, aren’t we? Texting put us there, so let’s make the most of it. Let’s outlaw as much as we can and make the fine, say, $2,750 for a driver and $11,000 for the driver’s company.  Yeah, that sounds reasonable. It’s for their own good.

 That fact is, we all know you don’t have to have your eyes continuously focused on the road ahead. Good drivers, experienced drivers, can turn their heads to talk to a passenger, reach down and tune the radio, pick up a phone, look in a rear view mirror…  Don’t tell me  you can’t do those things safely. Hell, drivers used to be graded (in driver tests) on how often they looked into their mirrors—something you need to do to check traffic, check your tires, and check your load.  

Good drivers, responsible drivers, can do those things when there is ample room between vehicles, but they keep their eyes focused ahead when they’re in close, fast-moving  traffic, fog, snow, rain, etc. That’s the way it has always been. Careless drivers aren’t as cautious, so they and others often pay the price. Government regulations can’t eliminate careless driving. About all this kind of law can do is treat  responsible drivers like children, complicate their lives and if possible fine the hell out of them.

And now we hear that somebody’s working on a device that will allow the police to detect cell phone use in a car that goes by.  So, soon, instead of using radar to stop speeders (remember when they were considered the main cause of accidents?), ol’ smokey will be focused on telephone and seatbelt violators.

Accidents involving big trucks are serious because of the size of the vehicle, but most car-truck accidents are caused by the car driver. Look it up. It’s not even close. So why is the Federal Government demanding truck drivers not talk on the phone, but car drivers can do it (though some states have outlawed it)?

Bureaucrats don’t understand reality, or don’t care about it. Here’s a clue: Instead of driving people out of the business, make trucking an attractive career for safe, responsible drivers. Let them do their job the way they’re capable of doing it. The economy and highway safety will benefit.

 

 

 

Truckers suffer in Regulation Nation

Written By: Dave - Feb• 05•12

Washington has become a vortex that sucks in the nation’s wealth and basically uses it to buy votes. But that’s not the only thing that’s draining energy, vitality and optimism from the population. We’re being regulated to death. We call our representatives lawmakers, and what do they do (besides collect money)? They make laws–so many laws, laws that sap the innovation, enthusiasm and hope out of all of us, not just business owners and entrepreneurs. No one is hit harder than the American truck driver. The rules these people are subjected to are horribly burdensome, stifling, discouraging, preposterous and sometimes downright laughable if you have a morbid sense of humor.

The latest attempt to collect revenue from truck drivers comes in a new law by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, which prohibits drivers who engage in interstate commerce or transport hazardous materials within a state from using hand-held cell phones while operating their vehicles. On the surface, it sounds like a reasonable piece of legislation. If you want to demagogue a new rule–that is, make it play to the emotions of the public–it should sound reasonable.

“This final rule represents a giant leap for safety,” said FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro. “It’s just too dangerous for drivers to use a hand-held cell phone while operating a commercial vehicle. Drivers must keep their eyes on the road, hands on the wheel and head in the game when operating on our roads. Lives are at stake.”

Okay, okay, we all know that texting and chatting are dangerous and have gotten a lot of publicity lately. But apparently, Ms.Ferro meant using hand-held cell phones was too dangerous for some truck drivers. The law goes on to state, “If a CMV driver is employed by a State or a political subdivision of a State (e.g. county, city, township, etc.), FMCSA safety regulations do not apply, even if the driver is engaged in interstate transportation.” What is this, honor among thieves? Or are lives somehow miraculously not at stake when the truck driver in question is employed by a government agency, at any level.

Today, a lot of truck drivers, especially those who pick up and deliver mainly in local or regional areas, use push-to-talk radios to communicate with their dispatchers. It’s really no big deal. You have the radio within reach, pick it up, press a button with your thumb and talk. So, is it okay to use one of those devices? Well, let’s look at the FMCSA FAQ, which displays this Q & A:

Q. Are commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers allowed to use push-to-talk mobile communications equipment while driving?

A. Yes, provided the driver does not reach for, dial, or hold the actual mobile telephone in his/her hand while driving and the driver is able to touch the button needed to operate the push-to-talk feature from the normal seated position with the safety belt fastened. (What!? So, can I use it or not?)

Generally, the use of this type of communications equipment does not require drivers to take their eyes off of the forward roadway because the button used to enable the driver to communicate can be operated from the normal seated position with the safety belt fastened. For example, if the mobile phone is mounted in a cradle or similar device near the driver, or there is a remote push-to-talk button near the vehicle controls to allow the driver to communicate without reaching for, dialing, or holding the actual mobile telephone in his/her hands while driving, the equipment may be used.

Okay, does this mean I can use push-to-talk if it’s installed in my dashboard or something? I can talk into the thing but I can never, ever, no matter what, hold it in my hand. Because lives are at stake.

Lives are at stake? Really. Then why is it still okay to use a C.B. radio? You have to reach for it, hold it in your hand and press a button. I suspect the government anticipated the response if it tried to outlaw C.B. use. Truckers would rightfully argue their need to communicate with other truckers and would be able to cite countless incidents where lives were saved because somebody got word out by C.B. of fog or accident ahead, or was able to contact emergency officials, etc. It wasn’t going to work. So what do the Feds say? Simply this: “The use of CB and two-way radios and other electronic devices by CMV drivers for other functions is outside the scope of consideration in this rulemaking.” Wow. See how easy it can be when you’re the one making the rules.

So, what’s next? Outlawing talking to another person in your vehicle…looking into the rearview mirror…sneezing? These are all things that no doubt have caused more accidents than truck drivers speaking into a microphone.

What about the real culprit–people in four-wheelers talking on the phone? Could it be the Feds don’t see as much potential there as they see in trucking companies for fulfilling their number one purpose–collecting revenue? Could it be that the regulators know they’d never collect $11,000 from an automobile driver using a cell phone, so that’s one of the few things they’ll leave to the states.

Yeah, that’s right. The fine for this rather ambiguous and suspicious law is $2,750 for a truck driver caught using a cell phone and $11,000 for the company that presumably allowed him to do it.

Good luck, truck drivers and trucking companies. They have you in their sights. But you knew that. It gets bigger every year–that target on your back with a dollar sign for a bulls eye. Every government agency from Washington to Bug Tussle has their greedy eyes on you.

 

2012: Time has come today

Written By: Dave - Jan• 08•12

There is a time for all things, a time to preach and a time to pray, but those times have passed away. There is a time to fight, and that time has now come.Peter Muhlenberg, Woodstock, Virginia, 1776.

And that time has now come for those of us who have been appointed by history to restore America. Peter Muhlenberg, a Lutheran minister, took up arms to defend his homeland against tyranny. He joined the fight, became an officer in the Continental Army and was distinguished in battle at Brandywine, Yorktown, Monmouth and Germantown. We won’t have to face artillery or a wall of musket balls, but we will each need a big helping of resolve, and it will surely be tested.

Our mission is to remain determined, dogged and tenacious, remember that we are the last best hope, spread the word like evangelists, allow that they will manage to discourage us from time to time, let it be a given, but also let it be a given that we will show up and vote, no matter what.

Remain steadfast when the Democrat enablers in the mainstream media seem to be doing their job by reporting how the fix is on in many battleground states. Democrats are shameless when it comes to elections. They will do anything to win–things that Republicans would not do and could never get away with even if they tried. Everybody knows it, and nobody cares. That’s what they want you to think. Their goal this year will be to discourage you. What else do they have?  But beware, Jackasses: It all rests on the assumptions that Democrats are compassionate well-intentioned (open-minded, etc., etc., and all that crap), ergo, fraud and corruption are acceptable if required for their victory. That platform has worn thin, and the Democrat Party of today has been revealed.

The Obama administration and its radical leftist Congressional cohorts were so drunk with power that they actually managed to wake up a whole bunch of slumbering Americans. Even people who seldom paid much attention to politics began to sense that the government was out of control, shoving liberties down its throat with both hands, belching a series of executive regulations after every gulp. Democrats and the press can do nothing but exacerbate the process. They simply can’t help themselves.

Remain steadfast when they smugly label you a conservative. Conserving the laws and traditions of America is what history requires of us now. Help moderates, new voters and offhand liberals in your family and social circle realize this. Don’t be embarrassed to be labeled a conservative just because it is a dirty word to the media. We are the hope of America. Time has come today.

Remain steadfast in the face of false economic reports. There is nothing Obama can do to ignite the economy. The things he believes in have never created prosperity anywhere and never will. There is nothing Obama can do to advance the cause of peace in the world. Appeasing tyrants has never worked. He could look it up. History confirms that tyrants respect power, not words, and are merely encouraged by efforts to appease them.

Obama and congressional Democrats are not capable of leading this nation to peace and prosperity. Most Americans know it, many more suspect it, and even the thirty-percenters in his base probably sense it, though they don’t care.

Remain steadfast, have faith, steel your resolve. The enemies of liberty will be called to provide answers, and they have none. Obama and his Democrats have come to depend on the support of shameless journalists to the point that they are not capable of winning an intelligent debate. This time they are toast, and we are the toaster.

 

The fight for freedom never ends

Written By: Dave - Dec• 09•11
 

© 1943 The Saturday Evening Post

The job has now fallen to us—everyone who is of voting age in America today.   It’s our turn to fight for America.  Most of us won’t have to spill our blood, like so many before us have done, but we will have to act.  We need to do our homework, spread the word, get involved, elect people who will mean it when they vow to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States. 

America is a great country, a country of good people—hard-working, generous, optimistic people who have always been willing to defend their priviliged way of life.  Yeah, I said it. No doubt some people shudder at the word ‘privliged.’ so I looked it up. Webster defines ‘privilege’ as a special right or advantage. And we have ‘em! The special rights are allocated by the Constitution and the advantages have been bestowed by American citizens who, over the course of 235 years, have built a free and prosperous economy and nurtured and protected the nation.

Anyone with even a minimal knowledge of history understands that freedom is something you have to fight for. What a lot of people don’t understand is that the fight can never end. Stop fighting, do nothing, and freedom will erode—even here.

New to politics? Let’s roll!

Written By: Dave - Dec• 06•11

I hold these truths to be self-evident: The U.S. government is massive, bloated, growing at every opportunity, with no plan or measure of control. It’s a condition the founding fathers feared most. What are the ramifications? For each and every citizen, it means steady erosion of freedom. For business and commerce–taxed and regulated to death–it means the days of American economic supremacy are over.

We can stop this. We can turn it around if enough of us want to. Who wouldn’t want to? Well, who votes for Democrats? People who are not paying attention, who are naive, who are easily demagogued, who don’t understand history, who have blue-collar Democrat family backgrounds (dating way back to when Democrats were Americans first). There’s a rapidly growing category of Democrat voters–people who work for the government. Many of the aforementioned are decent people who are supporting destruction of the America they grew up in, primarily because they don’t see the big picture, they don’t stop to analyze where we’ve been as a country, where we are now, and where we’re going. I give them a pass. I have to. Hell, I voted for Jimmy Carter. Why? Because I saw Hank Aaron walk up to his box seat and shake his hand at Atlanta Stadium back in ’74. Plus, he smiled a lot and seemed like a nice guy. Yikes.

The economy was bad back then (not as bad as Carter would make it), but I was only a few years out of the Army and didn’t have enough experience as a breadwinner to notice much of a dip. Yes, there were peaks and valleys in those days, but people didn’t fear for the survival of the American economic system. That’s the big difference between today and 1976. You don’t have to be paying very close attention today to understand that the country is in trouble like never before.

I give myself a pass on Carter because I only did it once, and I can excuse the otherwise decent people who have naively voted Democrat in the past (if they stop it now!). I can’t forgive the politicians who try to fool these people, though. They are the scheming, deceitful ones who will do anything, legal or illegal, to win an election. They are the overseers who care more about their personal power than their country, who would have our enemies win a war and our economy crash if it would help their party win an election. They are the bureaucrats who continue to lead America toward an economic system that has never succeeded anywhere in the world. They lead us toward socialism while European countries now openly struggle to get away from it and all its depredation. Economic central planning is such a disaster, even communists are giving it up while we’re headed in that direction.

Uninvolved citizens and salvageable Democrat commoners need to take some time to actually think about the kind of country they want America to be and the odds that BHO/Dems/Media are able or willing to take us there. If they wake up and do an honest and thorough reality check, I suspect that most will take action and help us restore America. Thirty percent won’t, but we can live with them; most of the Loyal Left wouldn’t work, pay taxes or fight for their country anyway.

Here’s some good news: Every day, there are more and more people getting involved in politics for the first time. They’re not doing it because they suddenly began to believe the Democrat talking points that the media put out, they’re doing it because they realize Washington is taking us over a cliff, and they’re ready to do their part to stop it. Welcome aboard, first-timers. Let’s Roll!

Enduring dreams of combat

Written By: Dave - Nov• 11•11

As a kid growing up in 1950′s small town Indiana, I was proud that my dad had fought in the big war, but I had no idea how much horror, anguish and phyical suffering he must have endured. He’s gone now, so I’ll never know the details, but a few years ago I found some disturbing news in a library book about World War II. I looked up 90th Infantry Division in the index and began going to the pages that mentioned their activity. I was stunned at the number of horrific battles they were in, at the heroism, the significance of their campaigns and at the carnage. I hate that he had to endure so much.

1Lt. Roy J. Reichart

The 358th Infantry Regiment, 90th Division, put out a booklet that told the story of their march through Europe. It was rather clinical, doing little more than describing where they went and, briefly, what happened there. On one page, though, there was a backward checkmark (dad was left-handed). It was the only mark he made in the booklet, and I’ll never know why he put it there. It was at a paragraph with the heading The Jaws Close, and it read: “After Le Mans, the Division cut north in clouds of dust toward Alencon, following the Second French Armored Division and blocking to the West any effort of the German 7th Army to escape the inevitable and fast closing Falaise Trap.”  Le Mans, Alencon, Falaise–these were names I heard recently while watching a program on the Military Channel about the Allies’ struggle to break out of the Normandy peninsula, and the raw footage was not pretty.

 I had no idea how intense the fighting was. I had always imagined that after D-Day it was just a matter of gradually pushing the German front backward. I didn’t realize how long it took (a month, I think) just to get past the hedgerows, where the Germans threw their best fighters–frenzied paratroopers and Nazi SS fanatics–at our green soldiers, often appearing suddenly, within a few feet, blazing away with their burp guns and then disappearing again into the hedges.

  The booklet called the hedgerow country “the ugly, bitter battlefield on which the Regiment was to fight some of its bloodiest battles.” I remember my dad speaking of the hedgerows. Strange as it seems now, his tone was always light, almost playful, when he described how he entertained his buddies by swearing at the Germans in their native tongue. The son of German immigrants, he would always admit with a grin that swear words were all he picked up from the “old country.” That was the only thing we learned from him about the hedgerow country. I always imagined that it was a rather jovial and somewhat respectful thing among soldiers, though they be enemies–the one advancing and the other gradually retreating, occupying  positions so close that they could easily hear each other’s voices.

Normandy, of course, was only the beginning. As leader of a Ranger platoon, my father carried a rifle across Europe, from Utah Beach, through France, Luxembourg, Belgium and Germany and into Czechoslovakia. He only told war stories that were light or humorous. In fact, I can only think of two others.  There was the time when he was in a bunker with some guys from another unit. I guess they were just hanging out, shooting the bull. A guy from my dad’s platoon came in, addressed my dad, called him “lieutenant.” The other soldiers looked at each other, and one said, “Jesus Christ, Roy, are you a lieutenant?” Because of snipers, officers didn’t display their rank on the battlefield, but I guess my dad felt kind of proud to be so easily mistaken for one of the guys. Then there was the story about trying to get some sleep in a deserted house and being awakened every hour by a cuckoo clock, until he grabbed his forty-five, opened the door, and blasted the thing off the wall.

I feel kind of guilty about having so many questions now, having never really made the effort to find out details when he was alive. As a kid, my world was a simple one, and I was busy thinking about myself. As an adult and war veteran myself, I was still self involved, but then I also had my own family and career to occupy my mind. On the other hand, if I had the chance to ask him more detailed questions about his experiences in the war, I still probably wouldn’t get much out of him. Well, there was one other time.  The Christmas season after my mom died, I was sitting with him and some of his friends at the bar of his favorite tavern, when he mentioned that it was the worst Christmas he’d had since 1944. Through all the wonderful Christmases he gave my sister and me, there was never a hint of reflection back to that horrible time during the Battle of the Bulge when our troops faced not only a desperate, fanatical German counterattack but probably the worst weather of the century–nights so cold that troops slept in snowbanks to keep warm. 

Only recently have I thought about the demons my father must have lived with. I had nightmares, gradually diminishing, for 15 or 20 years after returning from Vietnam, and I wasn’t even in the infantry. I was on a psyops field team for half of my tour, and there were times when, standing guard on a night so dark I couldn’t see my hand in front of my face, I thought about a human wave attack, getting over run, the possibility of having to engage in hand-to-hand combat… It never happened. And yet years later, I’d have a dream about fighting Viet Cong or North Vietnamese troops in my back yard or a supermarket parking lot. I guess there’s something primal about that kind of experience that sort of sets you apart from most of the population–the whole universal soldier thing. But what must my father’s dreams have been like?

Here, finally, is what I’m getting at. Most of the men my dad’s age in Kendallville fought in that war. You would never know it. They just went about their business and raised their families. They were my friends’ fathers, the grocer, the pharmacist, the plumber, the mailman and milkman. I don’t think it was necessarily out of humility or modesty that they didn’t talk about it much or reveal many details. I think they were afraid to open the gate. Why do I think that? Well, sometimes I cry when I see actual footage of the Vietnam War on TV, and I don’t know why–I don’t have anything dark locked behind a door in my mind. Hell, I’m happy tell war stories if anybody will listen, though they aren’t very exciting. But combat veterans have lots of doors locked up tight in the deepest, darkest regions of their psyche.

Maybe I cry for the lost innocence of so many young guys. I wasn’t a hero, I wasn’t an infantryman, I wasn’t even a very good soldier, but I sure knew a lot of them. They were just like me, going in. When they arrived back at the Long Binh Replacement Depot a year later, many were more like my father. Our troops who fought in Vietnam were as good as any this country has ever produced. From scared, apple-cheeked innocence to hardened veteran, so much changed in such a short time.

Even today, the survivors return with their worldly wisdom and lost innocence, feeling at first more kinship to a Roman soldier or Greek warrior than to their friends and neighbors.

They just feel different, and they’re not sure they’ll ever feel like they truly belong in normal society again. Eventually, most will shake the dust of Iraq and Afghanistan from their feet and go about their business, but it will be a long time before their war is over. They don’t expect us to understand–how could we?–but they will perk right up if they hear words of sincere appreciation. They don’t require it; that was never part of the bargain. But it would be nice.

 

 

The latest ‘dumb’ announcements

Written By: Dave - Oct• 30•11

Media pundits–in lockstep, talking points in hand–always announce who is dumb. Ronald Reagan was dumb, George Bush is dumb, Sarah Palin is dumb, now Rick Perry is dumb. As for Herman Cain–he gets dumber every time his poll numbers go up.  Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barak Obama were each labeled the brightest of the bright. These are brilliant people. Yeah.

Jimmy Carter was so smart he became universally considered the worst president anyone alive today could remember (until now). Bill Clinton? He was so smart he engaged in oral copulation (not sex) with an intern in the oval office and turned down opportunities to capture Osama Bin Laden. How about Barak Obama? His plan for America is one that has never worked anywhere in the world. What has worked better than anything civilization has ever known?  The system we already have (or had). Why? Because our Constitution gave this country political liberty and economic freedom like the world had never known. And our nation thrived on it.

So now, while European nations are trying to escape from the ravages of socialism run amok, our brilliant president is leading us in that very direction. And the media support him in his every effort. Not smart. Dumb.

The bastions of journalism in this country are either so dumb that they don’t know why their ratings and subscriptions are in free fall or they’re crazy (doing the same things and expecting a different result). And I say to the Democrat media: Just keep doing what you’re doing.  In the coming days, when America fully understands how destructive liberalism has been to this nation, you will become irrelevant, along with the Elite Left.

Media won’t back sure loser

Written By: Dave - Oct• 16•11

I truly believe that the nation is waking up to the destructive nature of liberalism, but I don’t think many people realize how much damage has been done, nor do they understand the true source of the damage.

Like most people in the fifties and sixties, I grew up believing that whatever news I heard on radio or television or read in the newspaper was true. I was only twenty-one when I found out that that wasn’t necessarily the case, and I was shocked. I found out by participating in a global news event and then reading about it in Time magazine and hearing Walter Chronkite pontificate on the event, “What in the world’s going on over there?” This was one case where I knew a hell of a lot more about a news event than he did.

Pleiku, January 1968: We had been on yellow alert for two weeks, spending part of our days loading M-60 ammunition belts and half of our nights in ditches and bunkers–three hours on, three hours off–waiting for something big. Something big happened on the last day of the month. Time magazine called it the Tet Offensive, a nationwide assault that caught the U.S. completely by surprise. What? I sure as hell knew that wasn’t true. And what’s this? Pleiku City 50% Destroyed.” We piled into trucks and went downtown to help the ARVNs mop up, and I couldn’t see any difference, other than a few buildings with bullet holes in them. South Vietnamese troops did a heck of a job during Tet. Don’t let anyone tell you different. And then you hear Chronkite talking about maybe we need to rethink this whole thing if the U.S. can be so thoroughly caught off guard.

Journalists crawled out from under their beds in Saigon hotel suites and declared the war suddenly unwinnable. And so suddenly it was. The Tet Offensive was a military disaster for the communists but turned out to be a public relations home run, thanks to the American news media.  It still sticks in my craw.

 The press used to be called the fourth estate, implying that its function of informing the public was vital to a healthy democracy and that it existed apart from and in contrast to the three branches of government. Now it’s often called the fourth branch, for obvious reasons. It would be even more accurate to say that the mainstream news media are twigs on the executive branch.

There can be no legitimate argument: The media eagerly became propaganda resources for Presidents Kennedy, Carter, Clinton and Obama.  Republicans were grilled, analyzed and investigated while there seemed to be no intellectual curiosity about things the Democrats were doing, unless it was something that could be praised to high heaven. But why is this so?

Some people say it’s because journalists are idealist-types. They want to save the world. Then why don’t they start by trying to save America? Why do they look the other way when they see a bloated, out-of-control government stomping on our freedoms and dragging the country to depths we couldn’t have imagined?

Democrats are compassionate, right? And Republicans are mean, heartless, racist, homophobes.  These labels have been applied so skillfully and relentlessly over the years that many within the media no doubt are shackled by the image as it exists in their own minds.  Leftists are patient incrementalists. They love shackles. Those within their ranks understand the level of ridicule and vilification that awaits them if they step out of line. They know how quickly they could become lepers at elitist cocktail parties.

 Still, I’ve always wondered why more solid, intelligent, well-trained journalists, liberals though they may be, don’t put their careers above their political affiliations. You don’t get noticed toeing the party line. You get noticed by breaking relevant stories. But it just didn’t seem to happen. Until now.

Now, suddenly, we’re seeing leftist media,  ABC News, CBS News, The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune among them, begin to hint that it might be a good idea for Obama to fade away. A sudden change in politics? A concern for the country? Hell, no. Individuals are expendable. The cause must survive. They’re worried about their party.

 My hope for America is that this obvious push toward European socialism (even as the Europeans try desperately to escape from it) has alerted the nation, revealed the destructive course that the Left has set for us, and ultimately will banish the Democrat party from relevance for a generation, hopefully two. Of course, they would resurface when prosperity made us careless again, but next time maybe we’d kick them out faster.

 

 

 

 

 

Media in full decline

Written By: Dave - Sep• 15•11

Independent publishing is like blogging. You present your ideas directly to your public and sink or swim based on merit, relevance, quality, and so forth, rather than on the authority of people positioned above you. Thank God for the opportunity. The blogosphere and indypub revolution, I believe, will save the country, or at least save it from becoming something most of us don’t want it to be.

This quote from Norman M. Thomas, who ran for president six times representing the Socialist Party of America, reveals precisely why I say that:

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism,” Thomas said. “But under the name of ‘Liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.”  He went on to say, “I no longer need to run as a Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our program.”

He was right, of course. And they couldn’t have done it without the complete, unfailing and shameful support of the so-called mainstream media. Thankfully, every time the truth finds its way over, under, around and through the traditional media outlets, those media players become less relevant and so does the Left. Let’s keep the pressure on.